2003 BMW X5 vs. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2003 BMW X5 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 41 kg more than 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
Model | X5 | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 99.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Top Speed | 240 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2154 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.3 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 107 L |