2003 BMW X5 vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2003 BMW X5 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (338 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (400 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X5 | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | X5 | 66 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1287 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 338 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
