2003 BMW X5 vs. 1996 BMW M3
To start off, 2003 BMW X5 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2003 BMW X5. (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 690 kg more than 1996 BMW M3.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (500 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW M3. (320 Nm). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 1996 BMW M3 | |
Make | BMW | BMW |
Model | X5 | M3 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 3246 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 63 L |