2003 BMW X5 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Avalanche (283 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2003 BMW X5. (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X5.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Avalanche. (440 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Avalanche.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 2004 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | X5 | Avalanche |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 5326 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 117 L |