2003 BMW X5 vs. 2004 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2004 GMC Canyon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Canyon (220 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2003 BMW X5. (215 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 225 kg more than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (500 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 2004 GMC Canyon | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | X5 | Canyon |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 3458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 500 Nm | 305 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 72 L |