2003 BMW X5 vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (338 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 109 kg more than 2003 BMW X5.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (400 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | X5 | E-250 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.3 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 132 L |