2003 BMW X5 vs. 2005 GMC Savana
To start off, 2005 GMC Savana is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (215 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2005 GMC Savana. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Savana weights approximately 150 kg more than 2003 BMW X5.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (500 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Savana. (353 Nm). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 2005 GMC Savana | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | X5 | Savana |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 500 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 117 L |