2003 BMW X5 vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (338 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Challenger. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (400 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Challenger. (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | X5 | Challenger |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 70 L |