2003 BMW X5 vs. 2009 Ford E-250
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (338 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2009 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 1229 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford E-250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (400 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford E-250. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 2009 Ford E-250 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | X5 | E-250 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 6030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.3 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 132 L |