2003 BMW X5 vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (338 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2011 Jaguar XF. (271 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2011 Jaguar XF.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW X5. (400 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | X5 | XF |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 600 Nm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7 seconds | 5.9 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.3 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 70 L |