2003 BMW X5 vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2003 BMW X5. (338 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X5.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW X5. (400 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | BMW | Audi |
Model | X5 | R8 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 420 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 430 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.3 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 90 L |