2003 BMW X5 vs. 2012 Renault Espace
To start off, 2012 Renault Espace is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Renault Espace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Espace (239 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2003 BMW X5. (227 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Espace should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2012 Renault Espace.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Renault Espace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Espace (330 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW X5. (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Espace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW X5. 2012 Renault Espace has automatic transmission and 2003 BMW X5 has manual transmission. 2003 BMW X5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Renault Espace will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 2012 Renault Espace | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | X5 | Espace |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.3:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.3 seconds | 8.1 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.7 L/100km | 15.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 83 L |