2003 BMW X5 vs. 2012 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC70 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 300 kg more than 2012 Volvo XC70.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo XC70. (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo XC70.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 2012 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | X5 | XC70 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 500 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2815 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 70 L |