2003 BMW X5 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2003 BMW X5. (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 258 kg more than 2013 Cadillac XTS.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac XTS. (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac XTS. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 2003 BMW X5 has manual transmission. 2003 BMW X5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X5 | XTS |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 11.5 |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 1912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2837 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 76 L |