2003 BMW X5 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (338 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. (180 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 414 kg more than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (400 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
2003 BMW X5 | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | X5 | Equinox |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 98 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1781 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.3 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 71 L |