2003 BMW X5 vs. 2013 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2013 Lincoln MKS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln MKS (360 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2003 BMW X5. (338 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 159 kg more than 2013 Lincoln MKS.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln MKS (475 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW X5. (400 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2013 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X5 | 2013 Lincoln MKS | |
| Make | BMW | Lincoln |
| Model | X5 | MKS |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 338 HP | 360 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2036 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5222 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2172 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1565 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2868 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.3 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 72 L |
