2003 BMW X5 vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 490 kg more than 2003 BMW X5.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW X5. (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X5 | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | X5 | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 6092 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3820 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 100 L |
