2003 BMW X5 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW X5 weights approximately 1340 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW X5 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | BMW | Smart |
| Model | X5 | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 33 L |
