2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1951 Buick 40
To start off, 2003 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Buick 40 weights approximately 240 kg more than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Buick 40. (292 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Blenheim | 1951 Buick 40 | |
Make | Bristol | Buick |
Model | Blenheim | 40 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 292 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 104.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3090 mm |