2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1955 Hudson Metropolitan

To start off, 2003 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 585 kg more than 1955 Hudson Metropolitan.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 453 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Hudson Metropolitan. (76 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Hudson Metropolitan.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Bristol Blenheim 1955 Hudson Metropolitan
Make Bristol Hudson
Model Blenheim Metropolitan
Year Released 2003 1955
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5900 cc 1200 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 41 HP
Torque 529 Nm 76 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1395 kg 810 kg
Vehicle Length 4680 mm 3800 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1570 mm
Vehicle Height 1120 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2170 mm