2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1959 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 2003 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. (210 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac Biarritz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 555 kg more than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Blenheim | 1959 Cadillac Biarritz | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | Blenheim | Biarritz |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 2295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3310 mm |