2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1962 DKW Junior
To start off, 2003 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Junior would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 695 kg more than 1962 DKW Junior.
Because 2003 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 465 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DKW Junior. (64 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DKW Junior. 2003 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 1962 DKW Junior has manual transmission. 1962 DKW Junior will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Blenheim | 1962 DKW Junior | |
Make | Bristol | DKW |
Model | Blenheim | Junior |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 739 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 64 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2180 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 31 L |