2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1963 Jaguar S-Type
To start off, 2003 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar S-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar S-Type would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar S-Type weights approximately 275 kg more than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jaguar S-Type. (325 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jaguar S-Type.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Blenheim | 1963 Jaguar S-Type | |
Make | Bristol | Jaguar |
Model | Blenheim | S-Type |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 325 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2740 mm |