2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2003 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,190 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. (223 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 585 kg more than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2003 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Blenheim | 1973 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | Blenheim | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 8190 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 223 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 2325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3220 mm |
