2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2003 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 95 kg more than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2003 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (230 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Blenheim | 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Bristol | Oldsmobile |
Model | Blenheim | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 230 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2740 mm |