2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 2003 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 510 kg more than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2003 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Blenheim | 1999 Mitsubishi SUW | |
| Make | Bristol | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Blenheim | SUW |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 1099 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 74 L |
