2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2003 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 97 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Blenheim | 2000 Ford Artic | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | Blenheim | Artic |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 68 L |
