2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2001 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2003 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac XLR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac XLR would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 259 kg more than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Cadillac XLR. (401 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Cadillac XLR.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Blenheim | 2001 Cadillac XLR | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | Blenheim | XLR |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 316 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 401 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1654 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 68 L |