2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 492 kg more than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Tundra. (298 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Blenheim | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Bristol | Toyota |
Model | Blenheim | Tundra |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 3375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 183 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1887 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 100 L |