2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 135 kg more than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700. 2003 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 2005 Kia K2700 has manual transmission. 2005 Kia K2700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Blenheim | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Bristol | Kia |
Model | Blenheim | K2700 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 94.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 60 L |