2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2006 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1077 kg more than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (712 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Bristol Blenheim. (529 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Blenheim | 2006 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Bristol | Dodge |
| Model | Blenheim | Ram |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 8276 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 500 HP |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 712 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 101 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 2472 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 129 L |
