2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche. (335 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Blenheim | 2009 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | Blenheim | Avalanche |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 307 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 335 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 117 L |