2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 75 kg more than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Suzuki Kizashi. (230 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Suzuki Kizashi.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Blenheim | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
| Make | Bristol | Suzuki |
| Model | Blenheim | Kizashi |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 63 L |
