2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2011 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2011 GMC Sierra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 GMC Sierra weights approximately 916 kg more than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 GMC Sierra. (454 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Blenheim | 2011 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | Bristol | GMC |
| Model | Blenheim | Sierra |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 315 HP |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 454 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 2311 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5847 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2032 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3645 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 98 L |
