2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (288 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Blenheim | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | Blenheim | Captiva |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 253 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 288 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 65 L |