2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Blenheim | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Bristol | Holden |
Model | Blenheim | Epica |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2700 mm |