2003 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 374 kg more than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jaguar XF. (340 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Blenheim | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Bristol | Jaguar |
Model | Blenheim | XF |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1769 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2909 mm |