2003 Bristol Fighter vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Bristol Fighter is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Bristol Fighter (518 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 329 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 720 kg more than 2003 Bristol Fighter.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Fighter | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | Fighter | 62 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 5979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 518 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 2195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3300 mm |
