2003 Bristol Fighter vs. 1964 Willys-Overland Aero
To start off, 2003 Bristol Fighter is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Willys-Overland Aero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Willys-Overland Aero would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Fighter | 1964 Willys-Overland Aero | |
Make | Bristol | Willys-Overland |
Model | Fighter | Aero |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7994 cc | 2638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 518 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2740 mm |