2003 Bristol Fighter vs. 1969 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2003 Bristol Fighter is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Bristol Fighter (518 HP) has 343 more horse power than 1969 Pontiac Firebird. (175 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 1969 Pontiac Firebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Pontiac Firebird weights approximately 185 kg more than 2003 Bristol Fighter.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Fighter | 1969 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Bristol | Pontiac |
Model | Fighter | Firebird |
Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7994 cc | 4100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 518 HP | 175 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2750 mm |