2003 Bristol Fighter vs. 1972 Lotus 72
To start off, 2003 Bristol Fighter is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Lotus 72. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Lotus 72 would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Bristol Fighter (518 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1972 Lotus 72. (444 HP @ 10000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 1972 Lotus 72. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Bristol Fighter weights approximately 925 kg more than 1972 Lotus 72. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Fighter | 1972 Lotus 72 | |
| Make | Bristol | Lotus |
| Model | Fighter | 72 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 2992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 518 HP | 444 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 10000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 550 kg |
