2003 Bristol Fighter vs. 1980 Renault 20
To start off, 2003 Bristol Fighter is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault 20 would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Bristol Fighter weights approximately 287 kg more than 1980 Renault 20.
Because 2003 Bristol Fighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Bristol Fighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Fighter | 1980 Renault 20 | |
| Make | Bristol | Renault |
| Model | Fighter | 20 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 1647 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 518 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1188 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2670 mm |
