2003 Bristol Fighter vs. 1982 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2003 Bristol Fighter is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Bristol Fighter weights approximately 275 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2003 Bristol Fighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Bristol Fighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Fighter | 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | |
| Make | Bristol | Chrysler |
| Model | Fighter | Le Baron |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 518 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2560 mm |
