2003 Bristol Fighter vs. 1988 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Bristol Fighter is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Bristol Fighter (518 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 409 more horse power than 1988 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Ranger.
Because 1988 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Bristol Fighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Fighter | 1988 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | Fighter | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 518 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
