2003 Bristol Fighter vs. 1997 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Bristol Fighter is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Mustang (590 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2003 Bristol Fighter. (518 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2003 Bristol Fighter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Bristol Fighter weights approximately 545 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (728 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Bristol Fighter. (714 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Bristol Fighter.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Bristol Fighter | 1997 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | Fighter | Mustang |
Year Released | 2003 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7994 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 518 HP | 590 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 714 Nm | 728 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2580 mm |