2003 Bristol Fighter vs. 2000 Chevrolet Triax
To start off, 2003 Bristol Fighter is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 123 kg more than 2003 Bristol Fighter.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Bristol Fighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 2003 Bristol Fighter has manual transmission. 2003 Bristol Fighter will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Fighter | 2000 Chevrolet Triax | |
| Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
| Model | Fighter | Triax |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 660 cc |
| Horse Power | 518 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1598 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2790 mm |
