2003 Bristol Fighter vs. 2002 Dodge Ram

To start off, 2003 Bristol Fighter is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Bristol Fighter (518 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 298 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Ram. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 404 kg more than 2003 Bristol Fighter.

Because 2003 Bristol Fighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Bristol Fighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Fighter (714 Nm) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Ram. (408 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Fighter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Ram.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Bristol Fighter 2002 Dodge Ram
Make Bristol Dodge
Model Fighter Ram
Year Released 2003 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7994 cc 5212 cc
Engine Cylinders 10 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 518 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 714 Nm 408 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 6 seats
Vehicle Weight 1475 kg 1879 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 5700 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 2020 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1830 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 3530 mm