2003 Bristol Fighter vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bristol Fighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bristol Fighter would be higher.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Bristol Fighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Fighter | 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | |
| Make | Bristol | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Fighter | Nessie |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 518 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2790 mm |
