2003 Bristol Fighter vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bristol Fighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bristol Fighter would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Bristol Fighter (518 HP) has 158 more horse power than 2009 Holden Commodore. (360 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Fighter (714 Nm) has 424 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Fighter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Fighter | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Bristol | Holden |
| Model | Fighter | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 518 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 714 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
