2003 Bristol Fighter vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bristol Fighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bristol Fighter would be higher. At 7,994 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Bristol Fighter (518 HP) has 395 more horse power than 2011 Holden Colorado. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Bristol Fighter should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Fighter (714 Nm) has 507 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Colorado. (207 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Fighter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bristol Fighter | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Bristol | Holden |
| Model | Fighter | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7994 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 518 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 714 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
